- ICP-MS measures elements, including toxic metals.
- Samples are acid-digested, ionised in plasma and counted by mass.
- It detects very low levels, many elements at once.
- It measures total elements, not chemical forms.
How ICP-MS works, step by step
- DigestionAcid breaks down the sample’s organic material.
- IntroductionThe solution is sprayed into the instrument.
- PlasmaArgon plasma at thousands of degrees ionises the elements.
- Mass separationIons are separated by their mass.
- DetectionEach element is counted and quantified.
Strengths
- SensitivityVery low detection limits, often well below legal maximums.
- Multi-elementLead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, thallium and more in one run.
- Wide rangeFrom trace to higher concentrations.
- EstablishedWidely used for food and supplement testing.
Limits
| Limit | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Measures total elements | Can’t separate inorganic from organic arsenic without speciation methods |
| Interferences | Complex samples can affect results; labs correct for them |
| Sample preparation | Incomplete digestion can affect results |
| Not an identity test | Element profiles don’t prove a sample is shilajit |
Speciation: going beyond total arsenic
To measure inorganic arsenic specifically, laboratories combine a separation technique, such as liquid chromatography, with ICP-MS. This is called speciation. It costs more than a total arsenic test, which is why many reports show total arsenic only; see arsenic in shilajit.
ICP-MS vs ICP-OES
ICP-OES uses the same plasma but measures the light emitted by elements rather than their mass. It is robust and suits higher concentrations, but its detection limits are generally higher than ICP-MS. For toxic metals at trace levels, such as mercury against a 0.1 mg/kg limit,[1] ICP-MS is usually preferred; see laboratory methods.
What it means on a report
A report may name the method as ICP-MS or cite a standard method reference. Results should include units and detection limits. If the method isn’t stated, ask; see reading a COA and detection limits.
Quality control in the laboratory
Accredited laboratories run blanks, calibration standards and reference materials alongside samples to check accuracy. Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 covers this kind of quality control for the methods in scope.[2]
Why a plasma is used
Atoms need to be turned into charged ions before a mass spectrometer can sort and count them. The argon plasma, running at thousands of degrees, does this efficiently for most elements in the periodic table. That is why one ICP-MS run can measure lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, thallium and many minerals together.
Sample preparation for shilajit
Shilajit is a complex organic-mineral material, so complete acid digestion is important before analysis. Laboratories often use closed-vessel microwave digestion to break down the organic matrix and keep volatile elements, such as mercury, in solution. Incomplete digestion could lead to underestimated results, which is one reason accredited methods matter.
Units you will see
ICP-MS results are usually reported in mg/kg or µg/kg (equivalent to ppm and ppb). Make sure you know which unit a report uses before comparing with limits; see units on lab reports.
Why some brands use other methods
ICP-MS instruments are expensive and testing costs more than some older methods. Some laboratories use ICP-OES or atomic absorption for certain elements, which can be appropriate at higher concentrations, but trace-level toxic metals are best measured by ICP-MS.
Putting it into practice
When you read a metals report, look for “ICP-MS” or a method reference, check the units and detection limits, and note whether arsenic was measured as total or inorganic. If the report doesn’t name a method, ask the brand which one was used. Knowing the method helps you judge how much weight to give a “not detected” result, especially for mercury.
In short
ICP-MS measures how much of each element is present, very sensitively, but not which chemical form it is in.
An everyday analogy
Think of ICP-MS as a very precise sorting machine. It breaks a sample down into its individual elements, sorts them by weight, and counts how many of each it finds. It can tell you how much lead is there, but not whether that lead is bound up in one compound or another. Speciation methods add that extra layer when it matters, as with arsenic. For buyers, the key point is simply to know which kind of result you are looking at. That one distinction clears up most confusion. Keep it in mind.
The bottom line
ICP-MS is the workhorse method for measuring metals in shilajit: sensitive, multi-element and well established. It measures total elements, so inorganic arsenic needs speciation, and it isn’t an identity test. On a report, look for the method, units and detection limits.
Frequently asked questions
What is ICP-MS?
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, a method for measuring elements, including toxic metals, at very low levels.
Why is ICP-MS used for shilajit?
It measures many metals at once with low detection limits.
Can ICP-MS measure inorganic arsenic?
Not on its own; it needs to be combined with a separation technique for speciation.
What is the difference between ICP-MS and ICP-OES?
ICP-MS measures ions by mass and is more sensitive; ICP-OES measures emitted light.
Can ICP-MS prove shilajit is genuine?
No. It measures elements, not identity.
How low can ICP-MS detect?
Typically very low levels, often well below legal maximums, depending on the sample and method.
Does the method need to be on the report?
Ideally, yes, with units and detection limits.
What is speciation?
Testing that separates chemical forms, such as inorganic and organic arsenic.
Sources & further reading
Primary research, regulators and standards bodies are cited first. A source being listed here does not mean it supports every claim made by sellers; it supports the specific statement it is attached to.
- European Commission (UK version on legislation.gov.uk). Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. legislation.gov.uk, 2008. View source (opens in a new tab) [UK legislation (retained)]
- ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. iso.org, 2017. View source (opens in a new tab) [International standard]